Re: Objects and Relations

On 19 fév, 01:06, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 12:48 am, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 17, 4:39 am, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > > "It seems to be the closest fit to how the mind works"
>
> > > Gah....Unghhh....<gnashing of teeth/>
>
> > I know what you mean.
>
> > The phrase "how the mind works" is high on my list
> > of signals that sets off the crank-o-meter. It's ideal
> > for the crank because it sounds super-smart and
> > it doesn't mean a goddamn thing.
>
> > Marshall
>
> All I'm saying is that nouns are fundamental to how we think. The
> claim that "entities are illusionary" is high on my list of signals
> that sets off the crank-o-meter.

Do me a favor, do no discuss crankism or trollism. It is a sterile question hurting cdt very much. Talking about it is encouraging it. Simply ignore comments such as these. Received on Mon Feb 19 2007 - 08:19:25 CET