Re: Objects and Relations

From: David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: 18 Feb 2007 16:06:01 -0800
Message-ID: <1171843561.587419.79320_at_s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>


On Feb 18, 12:48 am, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:39 am, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "It seems to be the closest fit to how the mind works"
>
> > Gah....Unghhh....<gnashing of teeth/>
>
> I know what you mean.
>
> The phrase "how the mind works" is high on my list
> of signals that sets off the crank-o-meter. It's ideal
> for the crank because it sounds super-smart and
> it doesn't mean a goddamn thing.
>
> Marshall

All I'm saying is that nouns are fundamental to how we think. The claim that "entities are illusionary" is high on my list of signals that sets off the crank-o-meter. Received on Mon Feb 19 2007 - 01:06:01 CET

Original text of this message