Re: Navigation question

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 16 Feb 2007 08:48:47 -0800
Message-ID: <1171644527.165497.176280@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>

On Feb 16, 8:34 am, "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 9:48 am, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Only a second to scan before heading out, but it appears that you are
> still thinking I'm splitting queries and making more round trips and I
> am not. Please re-read the example you gave and the one I gave. They
> have the same number of queries. How many times do I have to say that
> I am not, not, not, absolutely not suggesting that we do more round
> trips or split queries. Can you point me to where I have apparently
> mistakenly suggested such at thing? --dawn

Would you be willing to acknowledge that in the real-world case I've described the navigational approach is vastly slower?

Marshall Received on Fri Feb 16 2007 - 10:48:47 CST