Re: Objects and Relations
Date: 14 Feb 2007 08:03:57 -0800
On Feb 14, 12:51 am, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 6:49 pm, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Feb 13, 1:35 am, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> I believe I need to gain a deeper
> understanding of your perspective.
Oh, the irony. Where might I have heard that point before? Sky blue/ grass green.
> > > 1. In the design entities can be classified as inside or outside the
> > > abstract machine
> > RM does not take this view. It is not concerned with 'entities', but
> > facts - propositions composed of roles and values.
> I believe I understand what roles and values mean, but I don't
> appreciate the importance of the distinction you are making.
> My feeling is that my conjecture is comparatively easy to understand
> for OO and far less clear what it means for RM.
[snip] Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 17:03:57 CET