Re: Objects and Relations

On Feb 14, 12:51 am, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 6:49 pm, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 13, 1:35 am, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
[snip]

> I believe I need to gain a deeper
> understanding of your perspective.

Oh, the irony. Where might I have heard that point before? Sky blue/ grass green.

> [snip]
>
> > > 1. In the design entities can be classified as inside or outside the
> > > abstract machine
>
> > RM does not take this view. It is not concerned with 'entities', but
> > facts - propositions composed of roles and values.
>
> I believe I understand what roles and values mean, but I don't
> appreciate the importance of the distinction you are making.
>
> My feeling is that my conjecture is comparatively easy to understand
> for OO and far less clear what it means for RM.

OO uses nebulous terms to elevate feelings of understanding above actual understanding.

[snip] Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 17:03:57 CET