Re: Objects and Relations
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:20 GMT
Message-ID: <g43wh.409$R71.5677_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:20 GMT
Message-ID: <g43wh.409$R71.5677_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Bob Badour wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
>
>> On Jan 30, 6:32 am, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote: >> >>> On Jan 30, 6:33 pm, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
And this:
"The ideal way of resolving the two views would be to have a language that provides a set of simple primitives from which all good programming styles can be efficiently supported. This has been repeatedly tried but not-in my opinion-achieved."
http://www.research.att.com/~bs/ieee_interview.html
I think the simple primitives that have not been tried sufficiently are exactly the relational ones. Received on Wed Jan 31 2007 - 17:02:20 CET