Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Objects and Relations

Re: Objects and Relations

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:20 GMT
Message-ID: <g43wh.409$R71.5677@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>


Bob Badour wrote:

> Marshall wrote:
>

>> On Jan 30, 6:32 am, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 30, 6:33 pm, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:

And this:

"The ideal way of resolving the two views would be to have a language that provides a set of simple primitives from which all good programming styles can be efficiently supported. This has been repeatedly tried but not-in my opinion-achieved."

http://www.research.att.com/~bs/ieee_interview.html

I think the simple primitives that have not been tried sufficiently are exactly the relational ones. Received on Wed Jan 31 2007 - 10:02:20 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US