JOG wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 4:59 pm, "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 27, 8:11 am, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Dawn wrote:
>>>
>>>>JOG wrote
>>>>
>>However, I was starting to think, based on various postings, that my
>>understanding of what "theory" meant in "database theory" was
>>different from some of those who were database theorists. So, I
>>thought I would ask in order to learn and see if I was correct in
>>dismissing the Occam's Razor argument altogether. That relational
>>theory was a mathematical theory was highly significant (and to be
>>applauded), but it became THE database theory, it seems, with its
>>claims that no other mathematical theory could be simpler, with either
>>an assumption or outright statement that the simplest was the best.
>>On that point, there was no rigor at all, it seems. Agreed?
>>cheers! --dawn
What a fucking idiotic asshole Dawn is. I suggest anyone who is
interested go back and read the first few posts I addressed to this
moron years ago.
Received on Sat Jan 27 2007 - 14:06:58 CST
