Re: RA with MV attributes

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:30:44 GMT
Message-ID: <obmsh.3017$1x.52150_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

Marshall wrote:

> On Jan 17, 9:32 am, Gene Wirchenko <g..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
>

>>"Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:[snip]
>>
>>
>>>A related issue I find quite compelling is whether a single language
>>>could be designed that would incorporate the best of both, leaving
>>>the decision of which one to use in the hands of the programmer,
>>>to be made on a case-by-case basis, rather than in the hands of
>>>the language designer, who necessarily decides these things for
>>>all programmers using his language.
>>
>>Like VB 6?  You can declare variables as being of one type (say,
>>Integer) or any (Variant).

>
> Sure, that's a start. However what I'm starting to imagine is something
> that AFAIK is not in any existent language. The idea is that a given
> module could be capable of very strict static checking, such as proving
> the absence of infinite loops, faults such as divide by zero, and
> freedom
> from stack overflows through a proof of maximum resource usage.
> Another module could be completely free from such requirements,
> fully dynamic, having all checking deferred until runtime. All in the
> same language; the choice of where in the continuum you are made
> by the programmer based on the needs of the current application.

What is the point of establishing an upper bound on resource usage for a module if one cannot guarantee that the resource will be available? Received on Sat Jan 20 2007 - 11:30:44 CET