Re: Nulls, integrity, the closed world assumption and events

From: Walt <wamitty_at_verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:12:12 GMT
Message-ID: <0%Sqh.10481$wq.3623_at_trndny07>


"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1168882079.488314.138100_at_51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
> Walt wrote:
> > "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1168831761.571396.308030_at_11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
> > > Marshall wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > Sure. And since you are of the opinion that theory can steer us down
> > > > the wrong path, and since you regularly deprecate relational theory
> > > > but do not provide an alternative *theory*, I wonder at your
presence
> > > > in a theory newsgroup.
> > >
> > > If I had another comprehensive theory, I would not have so many
> > > questions or opinions that I want to pass by those who can correct me.
> >
> > No one can correct you.
>
> Many have, Walt, but thanks for the thought.

Many have attempted, but you have been expounding on the same incorrect ideas for something like five years now.

I doubt that there is enough information in the world to change your mind.

> What about you? Have you learned anything from this forum or did you
> know everything coming into it? --dawn
Oh yeah, I've learned things.
> Received on Mon Jan 15 2007 - 23:12:12 CET

Original text of this message