Re: Proposal: 6NF

Val Carey wrote numerous times recently and in the past:
> [stuffs words in other mouths] ... [bitches about what is
> /really/ XYZ] ... [whines that XYZ is not the "original"
> definition (much like a certain someone constantly whining
> about the "original" definition of 1NF] ... [erects straw
> men and chases red-herring to "support" broken arguments]
> ... [sneaks in qualifiers not under consideration] ...
> [falsely claims a reference supports his view (apparently
> just regurgitating references from wikipeducation rather
> than actually reading and comprehending the material]
>
> irrelevant ... bizarre ... mindless playing with formulas
> ... irrelevant chaff ... any introductory text ... primary
> school ... elementary school ... once you gradate to the
> book discussion ... quite meaningless ... irrelevant
> ... conjuring ... cheating ... absurd ... impostors

And after all his dishonesty and condescending insults

Jan Hidders wrote:
> Keith H Duggar wrote:
> > He said absolutely nothing of the kind, idiot.
>
> Please, Keith, there is no need for this.

You choose to chastise me??

• Keith -- Fraud 6