Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
From: Brian Selzer <brian_at_selzer-software.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:55:22 GMT
Message-ID: <u0fyg.1446$TV.288_at_newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
> Is this changing the subject?
>
I don't think so. He obviously doesn't have a clue about the problems with key volatility. In fact, it appears from his other comments that he doesn't understand the fundamental concepts of the Relational Model.
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:55:22 GMT
Message-ID: <u0fyg.1446$TV.288_at_newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
"paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote in message
news:bDeyg.252058$IK3.149094_at_pd7tw1no...
> Brian Selzer wrote:
>> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message >> news:e43yg.27359$pu3.361813_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca... >>> JOG wrote: >>> >>>> J M Davitt wrote: >>>> >>>>> [big snip] >> ... >> How much work have you done in the field? This comment makes you sound >> like a neophyte. >> ... >
> Is this changing the subject?
>
I don't think so. He obviously doesn't have a clue about the problems with key volatility. In fact, it appears from his other comments that he doesn't understand the fundamental concepts of the Relational Model.
> p
Received on Fri Jul 28 2006 - 04:55:22 CEST