Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue

From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:14:42 +0100
Message-ID: <Kd6dnZA9-oiBBl3ZRVnygw_at_pipex.net>

"Roy Hann" <specially_at_processed.almost.meat> wrote in message news:G62dnU5EwvF3DV3ZRVnytg_at_pipex.net...
> I am really struggling to think how your MARRIED TO table is designed if
> ON UPDATE CASCADE is a problem for it. What are its attributes? What is
> its predicate?

Woah. Brain misfire. Don't answer that; I misread your question. --Roy Received on Fri Jul 21 2006 - 11:14:42 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Cressey: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Mansour: "Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue"
In reply to Roy Hann: "Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue"
Next in thread: David Cressey: "Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message