Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)
Date: 7 Jul 2006 01:59:44 -0700
Message-ID: <1152262784.719940.309210_at_b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Ron Jeffries wrote:
> On 6 Jul 2006 00:53:43 -0700, "Cimode" <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >No but thanks. I appreciate the intent. I try to understand what is
> >your conception of how business rules should be associated to software.
> > In what purpose? According to what principle? Would you care to
> >provide logical and abstract concepts that regulate such relationship
> >(please no technology or implementational explanations)...
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't know how to answer a question about how to put business
> rules into a software program in a way that doesn't address technical or
> implementation concerns.
Understood...You are exclusively at implementation level.
Logical and abstract thinking allow to adress implementation matters in a more efficient manner. You will find out it saves you lots of time...
> Ron Jeffries
> www.XProgramming.com
> I'm giving the best advice I have. You get to decide if it's true for you.
Received on Fri Jul 07 2006 - 10:59:44 CEST