Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
48 messages
:
Starting
Fri Jul 07 2006 - 00:19:48 CEST,
Ending
Fri Jul 07 2006 - 09:19:43 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 15:53:48 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Dmitry Shuklin
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 12:24:40 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Ed Prochak
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 23:04:56 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Sat Jul 08 2006 - 00:00:18 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Dmitry Shuklin
(Sat Jul 08 2006 - 20:59:35 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 16:11:01 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 16:27:06 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Dmitry Shuklin
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 22:32:53 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Ed Prochak
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 23:18:58 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Marshall
(Sat Jul 08 2006 - 02:57:26 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Sat Jul 08 2006 - 03:04:37 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Marshall
(Sat Jul 08 2006 - 03:16:49 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Sat Jul 08 2006 - 04:42:47 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Ed Prochak
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 14:34:54 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Dmitry Shuklin
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 17:29:11 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 15:01:11 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 15:35:44 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 18:56:59 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 20:09:56 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Tue Jul 18 2006 - 12:36:04 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Tue Jul 18 2006 - 14:19:58 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Tue Jul 18 2006 - 16:52:43 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
U-gene
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 21:22:00 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Ed Prochak
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 20:26:29 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Tue Jul 18 2006 - 14:09:42 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
David Portas
(Tue Jul 18 2006 - 22:22:43 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Nicholas King
(Wed Jul 19 2006 - 11:49:38 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Dmitry Shuklin
(Wed Jul 19 2006 - 15:19:27 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Dmitry Shuklin
(Wed Jul 19 2006 - 20:04:02 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Thu Jul 20 2006 - 19:30:30 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
David Portas
(Thu Jul 20 2006 - 23:37:00 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Ed Prochak
(Wed Jul 19 2006 - 21:23:55 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Thu Jul 20 2006 - 19:17:53 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Ed Prochak
(Thu Jul 20 2006 - 20:12:30 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Josip Almasi
(Wed Jul 26 2006 - 15:51:22 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Ed Prochak
(Thu Jul 27 2006 - 21:57:39 CEST)
Re: What databases have taught me
Frans Bouma
(Tue Jul 04 2006 - 10:50:25 CEST)
Re: SQL for presentation
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 08:06:33 CEST)
Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me
Bob Badour
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 00:24:13 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Bob Badour
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 00:19:48 CEST)
Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
Dmitry Shuklin
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 12:12:43 CEST)
Re: A good book
Bob Badour
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 00:32:15 CEST)
Re: A good book
Chris Smith
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 05:06:26 CEST)
Re: A good book
Bob Badour
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 14:54:04 CEST)
Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)
Ron Jeffries
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 05:08:13 CEST)
Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 10:59:44 CEST)
Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
Robert Martin
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 05:22:24 CEST)
Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
topmind
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 06:52:46 CEST)
Re: A good book
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 08:04:01 CEST)
Re: A good book
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 13:02:50 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
S Perryman
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 10:11:51 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Marshall
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 16:55:13 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Adrian Hey
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 17:55:19 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Marshall
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 23:52:35 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Adrian Hey
(Sun Jul 09 2006 - 15:54:14 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Marshall
(Sun Jul 09 2006 - 18:42:22 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Bob Badour
(Sun Jul 09 2006 - 18:54:42 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Marshall
(Sun Jul 09 2006 - 22:58:23 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Bob Badour
(Sun Jul 09 2006 - 23:05:59 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Adrian Hey
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 01:25:04 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Tony D
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 01:47:40 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Tony D
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 00:06:36 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Marshall
(Mon Jul 10 2006 - 05:05:20 CEST)
Re: What databases have taught me
David Cressey
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 11:28:25 CEST)
Re: Select enumeration of intergers
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 11:40:24 CEST)
Re: A good book
Roy Hann
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 13:47:54 CEST)
Re: A good book
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 14:22:10 CEST)
Re: A good book
Roy Hann
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 14:51:55 CEST)
Re: A good book
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 15:14:40 CEST)
Re: A good book
Tony D
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 17:41:34 CEST)
Re: A good book
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 18:39:38 CEST)
Re: A good book
Anith Sen
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 15:02:28 CEST)
Re: A good book
Alvin Ryder
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 15:04:32 CEST)
Re: A good book
HungryLion
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 15:54:53 CEST)
Re: A good book
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 15:55:09 CEST)
Re: A good book
Chris Smith
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 18:30:15 CEST)
Re: A good book
Bob Badour
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 19:10:17 CEST)
Re: A good book
Chris Smith
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 19:23:34 CEST)
Re: A good book
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 19:40:24 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Dmitry A. Kazakov
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 20:03:45 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
paul c
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 21:40:46 CEST)
Re: OO versus RDB
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 22:12:52 CEST)
Re: Select enumeration of intergers
paul c
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 20:57:53 CEST)
Re: Select enumeration of intergers
vadimtro_at_gmail.com
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 21:25:25 CEST)
Re: SQL for presentation
Kenneth Downs
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 21:41:25 CEST)
Re: A good book
Marshall
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 09:19:43 CEST)
Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)
Cimode
(Fri Jul 07 2006 - 10:01:47 CEST)
Last message date
:
Fri Jul 07 2006 - 09:19:43 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 20:07:00 CEST
48 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.