Re: RM's Canonical database
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 3 Jul 2006 12:30:28 -0700
Message-ID: <1151955028.782768.115670_at_h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 3 Jul 2006 12:30:28 -0700
Message-ID: <1151955028.782768.115670_at_h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
AndrewMackDonna wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> >
> > In other words, this approach doesn't scale.
>
> Hmmm.. I'd have to say I disagree, having seen it scale.
>
> An example I think.....(off the top of my head)
>
> http://www.google.com/apis/