Re: RM's Canonical database
From: AndrewMackDonna <newsamd_at_amc.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:42:46 +0100
Message-ID: <e8brvv$tea$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
>
> I was referring specifically to scaling in the size and complexity
> of the development organization, not with the number of
> connected clients. Sorry for the ambiguity.
>
>
> Marshall
>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:42:46 +0100
Message-ID: <e8brvv$tea$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
Marshall wrote:
> AndrewMackDonna wrote:
>> Marshall wrote: >>> In other words, this approach doesn't scale. >> Hmmm.. I'd have to say I disagree, having seen it scale. >> >> An example I think.....(off the top of my head) >> >> http://www.google.com/apis/
>
> I was referring specifically to scaling in the size and complexity
> of the development organization, not with the number of
> connected clients. Sorry for the ambiguity.
>
>
> Marshall
>
I didn't see any ambiguity, I thought thats what you meant.
Take a look at Google's MAP api - its popularity (and therefore usage) is rocketing.
*(I have no hard data to back this, only assumptions) Received on Mon Jul 03 2006 - 21:42:46 CEST