Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: What databases have taught me

Re: What databases have taught me

From: Andrew McDonagh <news_at_andmc.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:56:25 +0100
Message-ID: <e846mc$7m4$1@news.freedom2surf.net>


Keith H Duggar wrote:
> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> Marshall wrote:
>> Side note: in a strongly typed language "extension" of an
>> operation can be accomplished only through an "extension"
>> of the type (actually a class of). This happens by adding
>> a new type to the class, so that the operation extension
>> be defined on that new type.
>>
>>> I'm not familiar with the term "predicate dispatch" but
>>> as I noted above, pattern matching is roughly the
>>> flipside of OO's subtyping polymorphism.
>> True. It does not add any safety, not even a feeling of.
>
> You know, there seems to be lots of jargon criss-cross here.
> For example, since type = class then "adding a new type to
> the class" is a senseless statement.

Ouch....

Keith, in some OO languages you are correct, a Type = Class.

However, from an OO PoV, Types dont have to be Classes.

This is especially true in dynamically Typed languages.

Or statically typed languages that support Interfaces.

>And as we can see
> "predicate dispatch" is at least unfamiliar to some and
> "pattern matching" can mean /many/ things.
>
> What would be great is if along with flying jargon around
> you all provided /examples/ (in some psuedocode) of what
> you are trying to describe.
>
> -- Keith -- Fraud 6
>
Received on Fri Jun 30 2006 - 16:56:25 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US