Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 19 Jun 2006 08:45:02 -0700
Tony D wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
> > I dont' bother defining prepackaged idiotic concepts and ideas that are
> > totally irrelevant to technical exchanges.
> But it was you who said "When I point out that I am boorish ?" (June
> 16, 8:18pm).
It's not first degree...
I stated that as response to Gene Wirchen-BULLSHIT to whom I wasted time exposing my intensions as he called me boorish just B4, I demonstrated he was calling me boorish for an unfounded reason...As a question and a mocking part, I used a pun question *When I point out that I am boorish ?* meaning *When I point out the hyppocrisy you consider me booorish*
Didn't you bother to find out what you were pointing out
> about yourself ? Isn't that a bit superficial ?
Superficiality is determined by evidences..
> > Why don't you assume your position through explicit communication?
> > What a hypocrisy!!!
> Where was the hypocrisy in using the sarcastic term "charm school" for
> your utterly charmless demeanour ?
Cut the BS...
> > Don't you read!!
> Sometimes, I wish I didn't.
Then be my guest...
> > Distates is not relevant..
> Very true. Like and dislike are very cheap. Best not be governed by
Best be governed by reason and intellectual honesty..Qualities you have not demonstrated so far...
> > I exposed his and some of his peer's
> > incoherence through sound arguments and proofs...
> In the thread I read, you blustered in a similar way to you do on this
> thread when someone didn't agree with you. There wasn't much coherence
> to your "arguments".
That's because of the hierarchical structure making hard to follow track of event chronologically...As I take the time to respond to ALL BB's barking dogs...
> > I do not give a damn about the person...
> Perhaps "boor" really is on the mark then: "a person with rude, clumsy
> manners and little refinement."
That's to speak a language more familiar to you.
> > > everything you complain about Bob doing, you have done yourself, and in
> > > even worse tones.
BS...I mainly insulted statements rather than people (Ex: What an idiotic statement!!) which is not equivalent to say *you are an idiot*. and ask legitimate questions such as *are you mentally impaired* when I can't understand when somebody does not get a clue of what I am talking about after several explanations...
> > BS prove it...I have taken the time to respond to your insults and
> > arguments one by one...That's a mark of respect you probably do not
> > even deserve!!!
> My only argument is that you behave in exactly the manner you
> disapprove of when Bob behaves that way; that makes you some kind of
> hypocrite. You've never responded to that argument, apart from in your
You opinion about me has absolutely no interest except to you...You should now understand that I do not really care of what other people think...
I have responded to each of you single argument but I will now stop as
you are clearly demonstrating intellectual dishonnesty....(Not
convinced check the arborescence)
> > I have not disqualified you as nonsense to evade your stupid posts...
> Why thank you.
Because I do what I state, I respond to people's nonsense to expose them.
> > I did not call you a crank, a troll, or whatever BS prepapackaged term
> > you can put on people to disqualify what *SEEMS* wrong to you...
> So far, I haven't called you a crank, a troll, or any other "BS
> prepapackaged term" (whatever that is). I *have* called you a boor and
> a hypocrite.
Which is no better considering that
> > However I have pointed out to you your incoherence,
> > your superficiality
> > and ignorance of RM concepts...
> So far in this thread, you have said diddley-squat about RM concepts to
> me. So you can't possibly have pointed out my ignorance of them.
When refering to ignorance, I was not refering specifically to you but to BB's barking dogs which I exposed on the Fraud Exposal Wall...At my knowledge, you are not on it...not yet...
> > Jeez who am I talking to?
> Calm down, mate. You'll burst something.
I am fine thanks...For temperamental people engaged in self promotion.... Received on Mon Jun 19 2006 - 17:45:02 CEST