Re: To Bob Badour, sorry
Date: 19 Jun 2006 08:13:52 -0700
> > > > > A lot of what?
> > > > > A lot of BS....From what I observed he brings mainly disrespect,
> > > > > insults and close mindedness...His attitude makes this board a
> > > > > field of eternal "OO VS RM people"
> > > > > and "you are saying nonsense"
> > >
> > >
> > > > Sometimes, you just have to call a spade a spade.
> > You have to be careful with such concept...Some people may use it to
> > disqualify anything that proves them wrong...
> > > And often not.
It's because such a question is difficult to answer that if one does not bring evidences, people should refrain from calling spade ANYBODY. This kind of behavior should be supported by sound reasonning, logic, knowledge and proofs NOT blind belief in a few ignorant barking dogs.
> > > Who's pushing you to do that ? :-)
> > To do what? To denounce the hyppocrisy and ignorance of some people
> > here...
> I was asking Tony D who's pushing him to call a spade a spade.
> Because only sometime you have to call it that way. The rest of the time you
> don't have to. You call it by other name.
> > > Where I have heard that before ? ...
> > Of course you have heard it before...It's just your ears are filled up
> > with SQL crappola to hear it...
> Whose ears ? What SQL have to do with it. I haven't learned SQL in school
> if that is of any interest to you.
Given the amount of proofs I have provided to expose false reasonning and ignorance, *some* people just seem to lack the cognitive abilities of making sense of more-than-3-prepackaged words such as *crank*, *idiot*, *fuck yourself* ...They clearly divert attention on people like me when they can not adress issues proving them wrong. My guess is that this is the result of practising and seeing SQL through RM too many years...
> > > >Sometimes admittedly
> > > > Bob will call it a bloody spade, and get rather exasperated that
> > > > someone still hasn't grasped the concept of "spadeness" and wants to
> > > > talk lots and lots about how they want to rename shovels as spades and
> > > > can't see what the problem with that is and hey I've been successful
> > > > with projects by using shovels and calling them spades and I've been
> > > > earning decent money since nineteen-canteen using shovels as spades
> > > > the difference between a shovel and a spade is only of interest to
> > > > those theory guys and ... and .. and ...
> > A confused reasonning...
> > BB insults (due to a lack of good manners) is not the worse part of the
> > debate...His incoherence and hyppocrisy is...He pretends one thing
> > (like educate you, help you) and in the next thread he insults you
> > which means he lacks coherence...I observe that and I do not need to
> > put a word on it (spade BS)...I describe a situation I observe
> > period...
> > > Maybe they were just talking about different things ...
> > BS, I have used terms, defined terms reexplained terms again and
> > again..Some people get it right away but certainly not paradign blinded
> > idiots
> Maybe I was not talking about you. Maybe I was talking about someone else.
I can talk of what I observed. I interacted with some idiots and lost valuable time explaining concepts through sound demonstrations...They do not give a damn...What interests them is self promotion....
Therefore, I created a Fraud Exposal Wall for some a FEW to quote their ignorance and incoherence...Letting people making an opinion of themselves of whom they are actually talking to...
(check out Keith Duggar, Fraud Exposure Wall for some quote of his). http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_frm/thread/a32a4f2f9c0ccbaa It is a beautiful example of somebody getting busted and trying to divert attention form a real coherent argumentation by self promoting and bragging...Loosing all control, he totally looses control and makes a total fool out of himself insulting...That's what happens when you expose frauds...
> > > > > I have confronted him with simple arguments he did not even
> > > > > understand...I had to reexplain a thousand times to receive
> > > > Maybe he understood them better than you think ?
> > That was my initial thought but I was wrong...
> > I reread the entire thread and presented him with documented and
> > succint ways of proving that some allegation he made were irrelevant
> > and wrong...No answer...Therefore, I draw a conclusion...
> > > If someone turns up it will be turned down.
What remains are proofs and facts...I did prove my point. All he did was insulting when he realized I disagreed with him...That's how ignorants react when exposed to truth...They either divert discussion to irrelevant subject or they get so mad to be ridiculed that they start insulting you non stop.
> > > http://romania.ido.ro/tornero-lyrics-6/
> > >
> > > Garcon! Another turn!
> > >
> > > >If someone turns up asking leading questions
> > >
> > > What's a leading question ? A heavy one ?
> > > >or pushing an
> > > > opinion or pursuing an agenda whilst simultaneously repeating over and
> > > > over that they're just asking questions and would like to understand,
> > > > well they can expect to get called on that. Reasonably enough. And if
> > > > it goes on over an extended period, anyone's patience wears out.
> > > Who's agenda ?
> > You better stick to jokes...Seems you are better at it than RM and data
> > management ;)
> With whom are you talking ? That joke was not mine. I translated it for you
> and replaced some ethnic groups to make sense to you. That's all.
> You don't know me to make that kind of statements. Ah, you used the word
> "seems" and ';)' .
That was actually a compliment with an encouragement to educate yourself more about RM and not do like BB's barking dogs...
> And by the way: what make you think RM and data management are not a joke
> these days ?
If you think RM which is nothing but applied Mathematics in data management science is a joke then you have to assume Mathematics is a joke. Do you think Mathematics is a joke? Received on Mon Jun 19 2006 - 17:13:52 CEST