Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)

Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:10:45 +0300
Message-ID: <e6md9s$pms$1@nntp.aioe.org>

"Robert Martin" <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com> wrote in message news:2006061313111764440-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom...

> I also think they take the need to manage data *within* their
> applications seriously.

What data is *within* applications ?
What do you mean by *manage* in this case ? assert(i!=0) ?

> > Declarative integrity constraints are better than manually
> > written procedural code for the reasons I list below,
> > and others.

> No argument. They are better. They just don't cover all the
> contingencies.

> Specfically they aren't in effect when the data is
> being actively manipulated in RAM by an application.

Why ? Received on Tue Jun 13 2006 - 08:10:45 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US