Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:00:46 +0300
Message-ID: <e6jkri$hio$1_at_nntp.aioe.org>

<kumar.vaibhav.jain_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1150007463.958382.299160_at_m38g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,

> I am confused on this issue that wether SQL is procedural or non
> procedural. What are your views on this issue?

That depends on what you call SQL and procedural. My definition: a procedural language is a language that allow procedures.

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_programming_language http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subroutine

http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~warren/xsbbook/node4.html http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~warren/xsbbook/node2.html Received on Mon Jun 12 2006 - 14:00:46 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: x: "Re: A better SQL implementation?"
In reply to: kumar.vaibhav.jain_at_gmail.com: "Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?"
In reply to J M Davitt: "Re: Is SQL procedural or non-procedural?"
Next in thread: x: "Re: A better SQL implementation?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message