twit-filters and honesty

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:48:12 +0200
Message-ID: <44838cf1$0$31653$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>


Bob asserted he twit-filtered me, so I can't directly speak to him. I have no desire whatsoever to engage in this stupid game.

Bob Badour wrote:
> I don't really know who created this glossary or who contributed what.
> However, I note that we already have a recognized standard for the bulk
> of the terms we use, ISO/IEC 2382 Standard Vocabularies for Information

The glossary has no ambition to compete with ISO/IEC 2382. It focuses on /real/ misunderstandings in c.d.t.

In his overzealousness to expose "VI" and what have you the stalker did not notice that.

> Technology, and I note that some of the most fundamental definitions of
> our field in this glossary are just plain wrong. One might think a
> self-aggrandizing ignorant like Dawn wrote them.

> And I suppose it should
> come as no surprise the maintainer has proved he lacks intellectual
> honesty.

I resent that. It hurts. I have no direct defense because I am in the stalkers twit-filter.

I can't even ask Bob to say what caused him to think that. The sharpness of his observation of intellectual dishonesty with other people makes it even more embarrassing. Received on Mon Jun 05 2006 - 03:48:12 CEST

Original text of this message