Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:09:37 GMT
Message-ID: <lIIfg.16173$A26.374992_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> Be prepared to respond with whatever solid method you used to support your
> own current technique. ;-)
>
>
>
> An application should have its SQL statements in only a few modules, and
> all others should be SQL-free.
>
> Note in my statement, you can replace SQL with GUI, XML, ORB, etc, to
> generally the same effect. The point of modules is to isolate and
> encapsulate.
>
> Is that so hard?
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:09:37 GMT
Message-ID: <lIIfg.16173$A26.374992_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
phlip wrote:
>>Assertion alone is worthless without solid method that supports it.
>
>
> Be prepared to respond with whatever solid method you used to support your
> own current technique. ;-)
>
>
>>And >>what method OO propellerheads suggest? OR mappers (which essentially >>are reincarnated OODBMS)? What I am supposed to learn 20 something >>ad-hock mapping types instead of 6 clean relational operators? Or worse >>yet, some "pattern"?
>
> An application should have its SQL statements in only a few modules, and
> all others should be SQL-free.
>
> Note in my statement, you can replace SQL with GUI, XML, ORB, etc, to
> generally the same effect. The point of modules is to isolate and
> encapsulate.
>
> Is that so hard?
Define: few Received on Thu Jun 01 2006 - 23:09:37 CEST