Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)

Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models)

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:09:37 GMT
Message-ID: <lIIfg.16173$A26.374992@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>


phlip wrote:

> Mikito Harakiri wrote:
>
>

>>Assertion alone is worthless without solid method that supports it.

>
>
> Be prepared to respond with whatever solid method you used to support your
> own current technique. ;-)
>
>
>>And
>>what method OO propellerheads suggest? OR mappers (which essentially
>>are reincarnated OODBMS)? What I am supposed to learn 20 something
>>ad-hock mapping types instead of 6 clean relational operators? Or worse
>>yet, some "pattern"?

>
> An application should have its SQL statements in only a few modules, and
> all others should be SQL-free.
>
> Note in my statement, you can replace SQL with GUI, XML, ORB, etc, to
> generally the same effect. The point of modules is to isolate and
> encapsulate.
>
> Is that so hard?

Define: few Received on Thu Jun 01 2006 - 16:09:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US