Re: Why all the max length constraints?
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 21:54:13 GMT
Message-ID: <9a3fg.213323$P01.26501_at_pd7tw3no>
>
>
> I don't understand the above, at all.
>
> First, if the theory doesn't require it, how can implementing the theory
> require it?
> ...
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 21:54:13 GMT
Message-ID: <9a3fg.213323$P01.26501_at_pd7tw3no>
David Cressey wrote:
> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1148925828.841431.188460_at_38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>>I know that there is nothing in the RM, the theory, that would require >>lengths. I don't know if there is something about _implementing_ the >>RM that would come close to requiring or at least really encourage such >>constraints.
>
>
> I don't understand the above, at all.
>
> First, if the theory doesn't require it, how can implementing the theory
> require it?
> ...
Heh, so the computer knows when to stop. Received on Tue May 30 2006 - 23:54:13 CEST