Re: Relation or attribute and why
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:53:24 -0700
Message-ID: <el7772pgbacd9c6melp8qlp6e5iaj1tb1u_at_4ax.com>
On 23 May 2006 15:44:15 -0700, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>Gene Wirchenko wrote:
Possibly fuzzy, but nonetheless.
Conceptual might fit on a napkin: "We want an E-commerce Web site
for selling our products. It has to be able to handle North America,
but we plan to go international, so have the capability to add other
languages, etc. easily without rewriting large chunks. We want
someone able to complete an order quickly. Do not forget good
security. OtherCorp recently had a bad situation, and they are taking
Logical gets into the details, but not the implementation.
Sincerely,
>> On 23 May 2006 13:44:29 -0700, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >In my example, the conceptual data model includes: name, firstName,
>> >lastName with relationships such that name has-a firstName and name
>> >has-a lastName.
>>
>> That is part of the logical model. The conceptual model is the
>> business statement.
>
>The identification of name, lastName, firstName and the relationships
>among these terms is not part of the business scope and definition, the
>conceptual data model? What would the CDM include related to these
>terms? I put everything that is conceptual and not directed to a
>particular implementation model (such as the RM) in the CDM. Where do
>you draw the (possibly fuzzy) line? --dawn
Gene Wirchenko Received on Wed May 24 2006 - 01:53:24 CEST