Re: The OverRelational Manifesto. VOCIFEROUS IGNORANCE vs. NUMB DOGMA.

Marshall wrote:
> U-gene wrote:
> > [............................]
>
> My difficulty with the ORM (besides the grandiose name,) is that
> I can't seem to make it to the end of your posts. I get through
> a bunch of introductory paragraphs where I can't pin down anything
> you're saying, and I lose interest. I have a short attention span.
>

I absolutely agree. I can honestly say I still have no idea what the 'ORM' is.

Perhaps the OP could post his point succinctly (one or two short paragraphs say), and I might be able to digest it?

> I vaguely sense that you're saying something, and that it's not
> even all that huge a thing you're saying. But I'm not willing to
> spend an hour to sort through all the words to try to find one idea.
>
> In the US we say "brevity is the soul of wit."

Yes, a great quote from that famous US citizen, William Shakespeare. (cough ;)

>
> I would be happy to discuss your idea(s) if I could figure out
> what they are. That would be a lot easier if you would ruthlessly
> edit your posts. I believe you are looking at features of relational
> languages, yes? Try to express the proposed feature in a few,
> or ideally one sentence.
>
>
> Marshall
Received on Wed May 17 2006 - 20:35:17 CEST