Re: Modelling Complex Sentences

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:13:01 +0300
Message-ID: <e3pvtl$rfb$1@emma.aioe.org>

"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1147101516.363934.178550_at_u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > > Neo: By reading the comments prior to the expressions.
> > > How would you prefer to know what a dbd expression means?
> >
> > Tony: Well, y'know, me being me I like formal stuff - you know,
denotational
> > semantics, axiomatic semantics, hell even a well defined set of
> > operational semantics would do. Otherwise we'll spend ages discussing
> > our various uses of English. "You say to-may-to, I say to-mah-to..."
> > But then, I'm kind of picky like that.

> Can you give me an example of a formal method of representing things
> that has denotational semantics, axiomatic semantics and a well defined
> set of operational semantics?

Too verbose. Just like your normalization method. Another loop ? Received on Tue May 09 2006 - 05:13:01 CDT