| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
David Cressey wrote:
>> I don't dispute that; please pay attention. I'm saying that SUMMARIZE is
>> not an aggregate operator; in particular, it is not SUM. SUMMARIZE
>> produces a relation; SUM produces a number. Is your point that you
>> actually want to use the same name for these two operations? Why?
>
> I don't understand why an aggregate operator could not produce a relation.
I didn't say it couldn't. In fact, I have mentioned at least one that does. SUM does not, however. SUM is iterated addition; addition does not apply to relations.
-- JonReceived on Tue May 09 2006 - 06:30:37 CDT
![]() |
![]() |