| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
Jon Heggland wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
>> Jon Heggland wrote: >> All of the above is syntax. You point to two different productions in >> the grammar and claim that only one can be an aggregate. However, this >> is not true. In both situations above, SUM is an aggregate function.
LOL - you might be heading for Bobs killfile!
>> As I said previously, you focused on form while Marshall and I focused >> on function.
>> Do you have a particular objection to the productions D&D chose in the >> grammar of their tutorial language? If so, which production(s)? How does >> changing the production(s) improve the language as a language? We might >> agree with you, and we might not.
Hmmm - no risk mitigation is bringing up the "straw man" - only Bob is allowed to cast such nasturtiums with abandon! :-)
Regardless you have got my interest - will read (properly) your past posts.
Cheers, Frank. Received on Tue May 09 2006 - 02:40:57 CDT
![]() |
![]() |