Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
Date: 24 Apr 2006 11:06:29 -0700
Message-ID: <1145901989.675970.236250_at_i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Jan Hidders wrote:
> Jan Hidders wrote:
> > dawn wrote:
> > > If you
> > > are saying that every site can implement it, including making any
> > > relevant changes to the query language, has anyone done that?
> >
> > Yes. User-defined types (UDTs) were already added in SQL:1999.
>
> Silly me. More to the point is of course the ARRAY type in SQL:1999.
> For an example and short explanation see:
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Teaching/2003/Databases/sql1999.pdf
>
> There they are still bounded, in SQL:2003 they are also allowed to be
> unbounded.
OK, so let's say that relational theory has caught up with Pick ;-) in these ways (NF2, 2VL, and LVAs). Where is this implemented. How I can I get access to this data from any reporting or BI tools?
This is very helpful. Thanks. --dawn Received on Mon Apr 24 2006 - 20:06:29 CEST