Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model?
From: vldm10 <vldm10_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 20 Apr 2006 14:10:55 -0700
Message-ID: <1145567455.539892.135210_at_v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
Date: 20 Apr 2006 14:10:55 -0700
Message-ID: <1145567455.539892.135210_at_v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
Dan wrote:
> Actually, this is probably not reinventing TRM; the paper notes that
> these concepts have been addressed earlier, as early as 91'. That sure
> puts a dent on patent claims.
I also developed my Data Model, which says
how to get the "column-based" relation representation
(or model where columns of relation are stored separately,
also known as "TransRelational" Model).
I believe that my solution is not complicate
and it is on the wide-ranging Data Model.
If you are interested, you can see it on www.dbdesign10.com
Vladimir Odrljin Received on Thu Apr 20 2006 - 23:10:55 CEST