Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM)
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:13:08 GMT
Message-ID: <UUjZf.56173$VV4.992070_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> What exactly?
>
> Fortunately, I know many guys having opposite opinion. So I don't think
> it's my problem.
>
> Do you really think that "already-addressed-problem" means
> "no-such-problem-already-at-all"? Do you really believe that each found
> decision is true? You shoud be very happy...
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:13:08 GMT
Message-ID: <UUjZf.56173$VV4.992070_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
U-gene wrote:
>>It sounds pretty stupid...
>
> What exactly?
Your whole idea sounds stupid.
>>...and rather useless to me
>
> Fortunately, I know many guys having opposite opinion. So I don't think
> it's my problem.
Uselessness is not a problem. One can simply ignore the useless.
>>Exactly what problem does it address that is not already addressed at least as well?
>
> Do you really think that "already-addressed-problem" means
> "no-such-problem-already-at-all"? Do you really believe that each found
> decision is true? You shoud be very happy...
Could you try to write something coherent and sensible? Exactly what problem does it address that is not already addressed at least as well? I mean other than coining some useless and meaningless new term? Received on Fri Apr 07 2006 - 04:13:08 CEST