Re: The horse race

From: Mark Johnson <102334.12_at_compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:17:05 -0800
Message-ID: <1ujsv1t7ugamgr1lh895qpte5srm08tlj8_at_4ax.com>


"JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:

>I would avoid this example guys as it centres around the subtle
>distinction between a mathematical relation and a db-relation.

Then you should define the "subtle distinction" if one is not the other.

Codd spoke of tables, as I understand it. I'm not sure a table corresponds to a relation, however.

>former ordering of elements within the tuple does matter

Because they are ordered by position.

>and in the latter it does not due to column names

Because they are named, which corresponds to a keyword/value pairing.

>i.e. you're both right from a different foundational assumption.
Received on Fri Feb 24 2006 - 01:17:05 CET

Original text of this message