Re: Database design
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:59:27 +0200
Message-ID: <dtcp3i$dcb$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
"Roy Hann" <specially_at_processed.almost.meat> wrote in message
news:3--dnYnbkrrCfmTenZ2dnUVZ8qadnZ2d_at_pipex.net...
> "x" <x_at_not-exists.org> wrote in message news:dtcjfn$f87$1_at_nntp.aioe.org...
> > Without asperities , so smooth and slippery that [it] is very hard to
> handle [...].
Thank you for correcting me.
I don't know English well enough.
I use English only in this group.
Could you grade me ?
> I don't know if the concept of asperity has been properly elucidated
within
> relational theory, though no doubt that could be amusing (for someone).
Well, the slippery part is not that amusing after a while.
> I am more inclined to read it as just the usual witless gaff of noticing
> that the bounding box of a printed representation of a table has length
and
> width and leaping to the conclusion that a table is therefore
> two-dimensional; planar: flat.
In other thread Mark complained about the slippery aspect of RM if I recall it correctly. Received on Mon Feb 20 2006 - 16:59:27 CET