Re: Data Redundancy
From: Leif B. Kristensen <junkmail2_at_solumslekt.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:26:34 +0100
Message-ID: <DMqdnU5UzM0H0Gve4p2dnA_at_telenor.com>
>
> Semantic information. I would not use RDBMS for text. The extensions
> are pretty kludgey compared to a real text tool. Image data --
> "find
> Mr. X in these photographs". Discovering relationships, like the "Six
> Degrees from Kevin Bacon" problem.
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:26:34 +0100
Message-ID: <DMqdnU5UzM0H0Gve4p2dnA_at_telenor.com>
-CELKO- skrev:
>>> What situation doesn't have a solution in RM? <<
>
> Semantic information. I would not use RDBMS for text. The extensions
> are pretty kludgey compared to a real text tool. Image data --
> "find
> Mr. X in these photographs". Discovering relationships, like the "Six
> Degrees from Kevin Bacon" problem.
Hey Mr. Celko. I've developed a genealogy database that relies very much on text. I'd like to have those query possibilities at hand that you mention, but in lack of anything better, I still think that the RM covers my problem space quite well. It's kludgy, no two words about that. But it works, and to my amazement, it actually is working exceedingly well.
I'd be happy to share some revelations about the data model if anyone cares to ask.
-- Leif Biberg Kristensen http://solumslekt.org/Received on Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:26:34 CET