comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 00:53:54 CET)
- Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Mikito Harakiri (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 01:55:49 CET)
  - Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 02:13:43 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 06:32:00 CET)
- Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 13:07:55 CET)
  - Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 21:38:59 CET)
    - Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:21:47 CET)
      - Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Marshall Spight (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 06:44:28 CET)
      - Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Frank Hamersley (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 09:55:42 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL FrankHamersley (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 13:45:12 CET)
- Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 15:26:11 CET)
  - Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Frank Hamersley (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 10:24:52 CET)
Re: all foreign key should have index? Christopher Browne (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 02:35:43 CET)
Re: Reminder, blatant ad michael_at_preece.net (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 02:31:03 CET)
Re: Reminder, blatant ad Tedd (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:39:46 CET)
Re: Reminder, blatant ad michael_at_preece.net (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 02:17:45 CET)
- Re: Reminder, blatant ad Frank Hamersley (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 06:38:42 CET)
Re: Reminder, blatant ad paul c (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 22:39:46 CET)
Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 16:59:51 CET)
Re: Data Redundancy dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 04:02:11 CET)
- Re: Data Redundancy Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 05:59:28 CET)
Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Mikito Harakiri (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 01:01:13 CET)
- Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Jan Hidders (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 00:37:04 CET)
Re: filling in missing dates in a time series Frank Hamersley (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 01:08:15 CET)
Re: Data Redundancy -CELKO- (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:15:05 CET)
Re: How are OO databases doing Jan Hidders (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 00:00:19 CET)
Re: Long Post - Re: How are OO databases doing Arturo Hernandez (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:40:01 CET)
Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec Joel Garry (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 01:39:19 CET)
Re: Data Redundancy vldm10 (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 00:17:40 CET)
Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP Mark Johnson (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 07:19:26 CET)
- Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP FrankHamersley (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 14:14:51 CET)
Re: Do I need a PK on a join table? Knut Stolze (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 08:18:04 CET)
Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 08:19:33 CET)
- Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? paul c (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 13:34:34 CET)
- Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? vc (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 00:17:05 CET)
  - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Marshall Spight (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 00:55:49 CET)
    - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? vc (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 02:16:05 CET)
      - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Marshall Spight (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 06:36:10 CET)
        
        Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? vc (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 03:37:03 CET)
- Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Mikito Harakiri (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 01:56:56 CET)
  - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Mikito Harakiri (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 02:46:31 CET)
    - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? vc (Sun Feb 19 2006 - 03:20:09 CET)
      - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Mikito Harakiri (Sun Feb 19 2006 - 19:07:32 CET)
        
        Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? vc (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 02:30:06 CET)
  - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Marshall Spight (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 06:33:15 CET)
    - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Mikito Harakiri (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 17:42:59 CET)
      - Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Marshall Spight (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 18:21:39 CET)
        
        Re: Relational Lattice, what is it good for? Mikito Harakiri (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 19:32:30 CET)
Re: Data Redundancy x (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 08:31:43 CET)
- Re: Data Redundancy dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 13:22:47 CET)
- Re: Data Redundancy Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 16:20:17 CET)
  - Re: Data Redundancy dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 16:34:01 CET)
    - Re: Data Redundancy Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:06:27 CET)
      - Re: Data Redundancy dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:50:38 CET)
        
        Re: Data Redundancy Marshall Spight (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 18:48:06 CET)
Re: How are OO databases doing x (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 08:41:21 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL x (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 09:29:35 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL x (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 09:44:35 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL David Cressey (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 14:03:22 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Gene Wirchenko (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 19:14:33 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL David Cressey (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 20:34:19 CET)
Re: Multi Valued Interface Models? David Cressey (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 20:37:50 CET)
- Re: Multi Valued Interface Models? dawn (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 21:21:16 CET)
Re: Data Redundancy David Cressey (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 20:44:55 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Leif B. Kristensen (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 21:53:09 CET)
Re: Data Redundancy Leif B. Kristensen (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:26:34 CET)
Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL Gene Wirchenko (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:42:22 CET)
comparing remote datadases sreenadh (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 06:37:29 CET)
- Re: comparing remote datadases Roedy Green (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 07:58:10 CET)
- Re: comparing remote datadases Cos (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 22:13:44 CET)
Has anyone attended the Wilshire Meta-Data Conference Arturo Hernandez (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 22:06:07 CET)
- Re: Has anyone attended the Wilshire Meta-Data Conference -CELKO- (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:16:05 CET)

Last message date: Fri Feb 17 2006 - 23:42:22 CET
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 17:05:59 CEST

51 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Other periods:[ Previous, Thread view ] [ Next, Thread view ] [ List of Folders ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]