Re: OT - Best way to handle dbdebunk
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:24:04 -0000
Message-ID: <SM2dnYPrWeYTzW3enZ2dnUVZ8qadnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:24:04 -0000
Message-ID: <SM2dnYPrWeYTzW3enZ2dnUVZ8qadnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139630829.504891.184670_at_o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> c) Ignore it (other than this thread in cdt)
Since you have already excluded option "e: ignore it altogether, period", I vote for "c". If you had a killer argument you'd have produced it by now. I can't think of any reason why you'd want to continue drawing attention to your treatment at Pascal's hands. I can't think of any reason why, in the absence of a killer argument, anyone else would want to read about it either.
Roy Received on Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:24:04 CET