Re: OT - Best way to handle dbdebunk

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:21:46 +0200
Message-ID: <dspj3c$fo9$1_at_emma.aioe.org>


"Alexandr Savinov" <spam_at_conceptoriented.com> wrote in message news:43f043f5$1_at_news.fhg.de...

> I think option c) would not be a bad decision. And the main argument is
> that this issue has nothing to do with data modeling in general and RM
> in particular. It is a mix of politics and psychology (or may be even
> psychiatry). There is many interesting problems concerning the
> phenomenon of DBD=CD/FP/HD but unfortunately not for discussion in this
> group. I qualify it as a fight for the legacy of EFC. I seriously doubt
> that it is interesting for you (and for anybody else except those guys).
> And in this situation you simply have no chances to prove anything
> because you have different goals, use different methods and see the
> world differently. Let them stay in 20th century.

Would you like a return of the Dark Ages ? Received on Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:21:46 CET

Original text of this message