Re: RM and definition of relations/tuples
From: Jon Heggland <heggland_at_idi.ntnu.no>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:19:44 +0100
Message-ID: <MPG.1df0e7883aa535a198970c_at_news.ntnu.no>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:19:44 +0100
Message-ID: <MPG.1df0e7883aa535a198970c_at_news.ntnu.no>
In article <dm6epf$tu7$1_at_domitilla.aioe.org>, x_at_not-exists.org says...
>
> Is this set *ordered* ?
> {1,2,3,4,5,6}
No. If it's a set, it's by definition unordered. It's the same set as {6,5,3,4,2,1}; only the textual/visual representation is different.
-- JonReceived on Fri Nov 25 2005 - 09:19:44 CET