Re: The naive test for equality

From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:41:55 GMT
Message-ID: <DWoIe.2944$ns.2552_at_newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>


"VC" <boston103_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7sOdnZvcEttiHGzfRVn-1w_at_comcast.com...
>
> "Paul" <paul_at_test.com> wrote in message
> news:42f12830$0$24039$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net...
> > By "representation" I mean the actual symbols used to convey the idea of
> > a "value", and they may be several of these representations for one
value.
> >
>
> I do not understand this.

I think the term "literal value" from classical programming language documents might be relevant here.

The literal value conveys from the writer to the reader a specific value from one of the types. Thus

12345 is a literal value
123.45 is a literal value
'123.45' is a literal value (of a string). Received on Thu Aug 04 2005 - 15:41:55 CEST

Original text of this message