Re: sql views for denomalizing
From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 3 Aug 2005 18:57:36 -0700
Message-ID: <1123120656.124816.84550_at_g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 3 Aug 2005 18:57:36 -0700
Message-ID: <1123120656.124816.84550_at_g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
dawn wrote:
> Marshall Spight wrote:
>
> We might have beat this one to death at this
> point. I'm definitely catching on that when I talk about a "data
> model" and when someone else here talks about a "data model" we have
> different pictures in our heads as to where that model might need to be
> employed. Is that your sense as well?
Yes. I've mostly been talking about the metamodel lately, and I think you're not drawing the distinction between the metamodel and a model built in the metamodel.
Marshall Received on Thu Aug 04 2005 - 03:57:36 CEST