Re: transitive closure
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 19 Jul 2005 07:47:40 -0700
Message-ID: <1121784460.593898.288970_at_g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 19 Jul 2005 07:47:40 -0700
Message-ID: <1121784460.593898.288970_at_g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> Has working on this operator produced any insights for you?
Yes, some similar to those discussed in "Godel Escher Bach" by Hofstadter.
> Some non-truths go through the same process, though.
> Viz. XML. Currently in the "accepted as self-evident" phase.
I am not an XML proponent either.
> I like to believe there's a "what was I thinking?!" phase that comes after. :-)
Your forture cookie states, "You will be pleasantly surprised" :) Received on Tue Jul 19 2005 - 16:47:40 CEST