Re: Implementation of boolean types.

From: -CELKO- <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net>
Date: 14 Jul 2005 07:08:48 -0700
Message-ID: <1121350128.354978.202460_at_g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


>> I'm not clear whether NULL is equivalent to UNKNOWN or not; I've not scrutinized the weasel-words carefully enough. <<

Nobody is sure and that is a serious problem with that extension. You have to sudenly change the way that NULLs are handled and how 3VL works no matter what you decide. Nobody thought this out, so nobody wants to implement it. Received on Thu Jul 14 2005 - 16:08:48 CEST

Original text of this message