Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 14:59:54 +0200
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 13:37:31 GMT, Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote:
>> Jan Hidders wrote:
>>>>Well, the "atomicity" definition doesn't hold up under scrutiny, and
>>>>the "you shouldn't have more than one column about the same thing"
>>>>definition is too informal.
>>>Yeah, that's what Date claims. Many disagree, including me.
>> You think that atomicity is a well defined concept?
>No. But I think it is understood well-enough to be a useful concept.
Most people think that atomic means indivisible in that context, and it does not make any sense.
Regards Received on Tue Jul 05 2005 - 14:59:54 CEST