Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
From: Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.this_at_see.sigblock>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:20:42 -0400
Message-Id: <47ngn2-en8.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net>
>
>
> ...[trim]...
>
>
>
> Some interesting responses, such as 'And, to tell the
> truth, I regard Oracle as "close enough for practical
> purposes".'
>
> In this case, the percentage might have been stated by this
> responder to be 90% (truly relational). Thanks for the
> reference.
>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:20:42 -0400
Message-Id: <47ngn2-en8.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net>
mountain man wrote:
> "Kenneth Downs" <knode.wants.this_at_see.sigblock> wrote in message
> news:70cgn2-d18.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net...
>> mountain man wrote:
>
>>> The rating of 100 equates to full realisation of the RM. >>> The rating of 50 equates to half realisation of the RM. >>> The rating of 10 equates to 10% realisation of the RM. >>> The rating of 0 equates to zero realisation of the RM
>
> ...[trim]...
>
>> Search on Google Groups for a thread called "4 the FAQ: Are Commercial >> DBMS >> Truly Relational" Most of the issues were dealt with in that thread.
>
>
> Some interesting responses, such as 'And, to tell the
> truth, I regard Oracle as "close enough for practical
> purposes".'
>
> In this case, the percentage might have been stated by this
> responder to be 90% (truly relational). Thanks for the
> reference.
>
-- Kenneth Downs Secure Data Software, Inc. (Ken)nneth_at_(Sec)ure(Dat)a(.com)Received on Tue Jun 07 2005 - 16:20:42 CEST