Re: Translating constraints to RM Terms

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:17:54 +0200
Message-ID: <mmm8a1p79kl1ogkmnf4v4m0iv0iuk1ga4j@4ax.com>

On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:14:12 -0400, Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.this_at_see.sigblock> wrote:

>Jonathan gave a pretty clear answer on type <> domain,

Where?

He said: column <> domain.

Type and domain are almost always used as synonyms.

> so I am with you so
>far. Most importantly, the restatement of the question as relationship
>twixt types and constraints is on the money. In my own mind I am also
>asking if the constraint is a property of the column or the table.

Your constraint is a property of the table because it is not a column type constraint.

Regards Received on Mon Jun 06 2005 - 09:17:54 CDT