Re: Translating constraints to RM Terms

On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:05:36 -0400, Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.this_at_see.sigblock> wrote:

>Then I guess my question is restated, does the RM have anything to say about
>defining one column in terms of another?

Queries.

> While the constraint is generally
>expressed and accepted as existing as a property of the *table*, is it not
>in fact a fundamental property of COLUMN A?

It is not.

Regards Received on Mon Jun 06 2005 - 09:18:43 CDT