Re: deductive databases
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:07:07 +0200
Message-ID: <i8s681h5vi6oq1da8oei2qobp147d17upg_at_4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:07:07 +0200
Message-ID: <i8s681h5vi6oq1da8oei2qobp147d17upg_at_4ax.com>
On 12 May 2005 06:59:18 -0700, "-CELKO-" <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
>I don't think I would call Oracle "State of the Art";
I agree.
>Standard SQL has the SQL/PSM and CTE (Common Table Expressions), so we
>are computationally complete. But the truth is that most commercial
>users do not need recursion to do a payroll, keep an inventory, etc.
I disagree, most commercial users would need recursion to solve the
part explosion problems of most inventory systems.
Regards