Re: Terminology for composite attributes
From: Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:54:01 GMT
Message-ID: <dut0e.2555$gI5.825_at_newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
>
> <snip>
>
> And so your answer to the question of terminology for "composite
> attributes" would be ... ? --dawn
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:54:01 GMT
Message-ID: <dut0e.2555$gI5.825_at_newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
dawn wrote:
> Neo wrote:
>>>I'd like to know if "composite attributes" is the best >>> terminology... >>The answer might depend on what one considers to be "best". >> >>The XDb3 script below models [...]
>
> <snip>
>
> And so your answer to the question of terminology for "composite
> attributes" would be ... ? --dawn
Irrelevant?
-- Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> Email: jleffler_at_earthlink.net, jleffler_at_us.ibm.com Guardian of DBD::Informix v2005.01 -- http://dbi.perl.org/Received on Thu Mar 24 2005 - 07:54:01 CET