Re: Terminology for composite attributes

Neo wrote:
> > I'd like to know if "composite attributes" is the best
terminology...
>
> The answer might depend on what one considers to be "best".
>
> The XDb3 script below models a person without a phone number, a
person
> with 1 phone number, and a person with 3 phone numbers each having
> multiple types and attributes some of which are created on the fly.
<snip>

And so your answer to the question of terminology for "composite attributes" would be ... ? --dawn Received on Wed Mar 23 2005 - 15:55:41 CET